'Reform in government Essay\r'

'When it comes to make reform in political science, politicians be political weapons platformmed to act in one distinct manner. They want to prop up throwing on government programs. The idea and frequent thought on this is that if you throw enough bills at some function, it is bound to improve. This type of thinking is what causes politicians to resume lots of new programs to the docket when in reality, they father not yet taken the cadence to prize the success of progress of their already implemented programs.\r\n at that place are many reasons why this type of thing might happen, but one of the most all-important(prenominal) is because, simply put, there is not enough time to sit back and prise new programs. The thought, at least in the minds of politicians, is that these programs take a hardly a(prenominal) years to really have an impact. This means that the tyrannical or negative things associated with a new program will not be key outn for many months, so politic ians do not think that they can the right way evaluate it (USGovernment outlay. com).\r\nThe solution for this problem would be to evaluate programs starting further back before commiting to spend more money on new government programs, but this is not the way that politicians are programmed. They are programmed in a way that rewards public spending and new reform. This is one thing that politicians can superman to when they run for re-election, so that people will see that they are doing something in Washington. Even if a program is not successful in affecting sort in society, politicians are able to say that they were doing something in order to fix the problem, even if that something was counterproductive in nature.\r\n'