'Pros and/or Cons of Stand Your Ground Law Essay\r'

'The notorious George Zimmerman case has stirred the controversy around theme Your background signal laws and brought these laws to the public light, becoming the subject of wide awake nationwide debates whether these laws should be repealed or not. Like many an(prenominal) controversial legislative, point of view Your make laws wipe out their critics and proponents, and both(prenominal) sides tend to make valid points in denial of their position. The goal of this paper is to show cons and pros of Stand Your groundwork laws. In Florida as well as 21 other(a) Ameri arse states, as give tongue to by to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the above-mentioned laws be self-defense laws that relieve individuals of their â€Å"duty to retract from an assaulter before using consequence against them anywhere they are level-headedly leaseed to be” (Clark).\r\nWhile in prevalent these laws do not use such a notion as â€Å"stand your ground” specifi cally, Florida unneurotic with nine other states has these words in its law. In Stand Your farming law in Florida, particularly, it is stated that â€Å"a person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a salutary to be has no duty to retreat and has the make up to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent demolition or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony” (qtd. in Clark).\r\nThe major con of this law, as its critics prize, is that it essentially gives individuals with malicious intent a legal loophole to avoid cruel prosecution for putting to deathing psyche if these individual state that they had to support themselves. Eric Holder, the US attorney General, is among those opponents of Stand Your Ground laws who believe that these laws will allow individuals to provoke others to attack them first and then, as it can be deemed self-defense and these individuals will not lose the duty to retreat, they will be able to kill them without fear of getting prosecuted (Cooke). In states with Stand Your Ground laws, people will not have to think twice whether they should use weapons to defend themselves against the attackers or retreat because they will have the mature to kill their attackers. much(prenominal) violence will breed further violence.\r\nCriminals whitethorn use this law to cover up the roll and premeditated killing of people. However, proponents of this law may answer to the above-mentioned claims of their counterparts as follows. This critique of Stand Your Ground crumbles under the weight of the argument that â€Å"In nigh every state, if and when an individual enters into an altercation with the deliberate tendency of provoking the other party into threatening him with death or injury, they lose the righ t to claim that they were playacting in self-defense” (Cooke).\r\nAll individuals have the right to liberty and life and therefore, they have the right to defend themselves. Those who attack people violate their victims’ rights to live, so Stand Your Ground laws legally recognize these rights, attempting to â€Å"tilt the oddment in favor of the attacked” (Cooke). Both, the opponents and proponents of Stand Your Ground laws have reasonable and sound arguments, but they need to name some middle ground regarding these laws that will fulfil both sides.\r\nWorks Cited\r\nClark, Korey. Nearly Half of States fuck off â€Å"Stand Your Ground” Laws like Florida’s. 2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2013. http://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/criminal/b/criminal-law-blog/archive/2013/07/24/nearly-half-of-states-have-quot-stand-your-ground-quot-laws-like-florida-39-s.aspx. Cooke, Charles C.W. Stand Your Ground on Stand Your Ground. 2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2013 .\r\n'